Recent discussions between Israel and South Sudan reportedly focus on a controversial proposal to relocate Palestinians from Gaza to the East African nation. This initiative, according to six sources familiar with the negotiations, has sparked significant concern among human rights organizations, which argue that such an action would constitute forcible expulsion and potentially amount to ethnic cleansing, violating international law.

Critics of this potential transfer express fears that the relocation could lead to a permanent displacement of Palestinians from Gaza, undermining any chance of their return. Furthermore, they warn that this mass departure could facilitate efforts by far-right elements within the Israeli government to annex the Gaza Strip and re-establish Israeli settlements, a move that has raised substantial alarm among international observers.

South Sudan, which has faced severe challenges since gaining independence in 2011—including a devastating civil war that claimed nearly 400,000 lives and continues to create humanitarian crises—already accommodates a sizable refugee population from various conflicts in neighboring countries. As it grapples with these ongoing issues, the prospect of becoming a new home for displaced persons from Gaza raises ethical and logistical concerns.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has suggested that facilitating what he terms “voluntary migration” for a significant portion of Gaza’s population aligns with his broader strategic objectives, echoing views previously articulated by former U.S. President Donald Trump. In recent comments made on Israeli TV, Netanyahu indicated his belief that allowing civilians to exit amid a military campaign is a prudent approach in line with international norms. However, he did not specifically mention discussions with South Sudan.

Additionally, reports have emerged indicating that Israel and the United States have explored similar proposals with other nations, including Sudan and Somalia. Meanwhile, Egypt, sharing its border with Gaza, has expressed strong opposition to any plans to forcibly transfer Palestinians, concerned about the potential influx of refugees into its territories.

Edmund Yakani, a prominent civil society leader in South Sudan, emphasized the importance of safeguarding the rights and dignity of both his fellow citizens and any potential refugees, stating that his country should not agree to host displaced individuals as bargaining chips in geopolitical negotiations. Furthermore, Joe Szlavik, a lobbying professional engaged with South Sudan, noted that officials are looking for improvements in diplomatic relations with the U.S., particularly concerning sanctions and travel bans.

In an environment where South Sudan is striving for allies and economic partnerships amid pressing constraints, the discussions surrounding this potential relocation serve as a reminder of the complexities faced by nations and populations navigating the fallout of international conflicts.